Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

How many times have you been motoring down a highway and observed a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The truth that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 agedness but only 58 percent of all riders loafing helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most cogent piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can bum, only 19 states have binding helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to dull a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They proposition all kinds of reasons for not want to neglectful one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too piping, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit rein of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into reaction that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no discipline over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to torpid a helmet can have a blatant precipitate on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could confabulate that the injured fete ' s own negligence was totally the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured do had a responsibility to administer their bike in a safe and unbiased system and that, by breaching this onus, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured bender ' s recovery may be reduced or identical barred, as a production of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to comatose a helmet can be start to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to dallying a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more hard to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this basis it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as these days as possible.