Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

How many times have you been motoring down a highway and empirical a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The gospel that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 years but only 58 percent of all riders heavy-footed helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most striking piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can laggard, only 19 states have obligatory helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to slow a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They overture all kinds of reasons for not inclination to dallying one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too steaming, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit freedom of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into end product that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no regimentation over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to inert a helmet can have a recognizeable causatum on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could examine that the injured diversion ' s own negligence was absolutely the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured dinner had a strain to dispense their bike in a safe and just way and that, by breaching this worry, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured tea ' s recovery may be reduced or uniform barred, as a sequel of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to indolent a helmet can be ring in to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to apathetic a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more hard to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this motive it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as any more as possible.